| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
One can do all the photography with a digital SLR (Canon, Nikon, Fuji, Kodak) that can be done with a conventional SLR. There is a really fine lens made for Canon which is 1X to 5X. A range that covers most macro needs. This along with a ring flash is a formidable macro set-up. One advantage of the above cameras is that if one should wish to do film photography it is just a matter of changing the camera body. All the other equipment, lens, flash, bellows, etc, are standard. It is definitely true that for internet publishing the quality constraints are a good bit lower. At 72 pixels/inch it is not difficult to get a satisfactory image. The image still needs to be properly in focus however. There are a lot of fossil images on the internet that could be improved. The statement on the difficulty of archiving digital images illustrates a very serious problem. Not only do the standards continually change but the digital storage media is a big unknown for stability. Are CD-R's and -RW's really stabile? As far as I know there are no long term stability standards. As we go to DVD's will this improve? There are already a couple standards with it. A very large unmet need. Tom Whiteley tomw@rochester.rr.com
Partial index: