| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
At 9:49 PM +0200 10/24/01, Stefan Bengtson wrote: >Tom Whiteley makes a number of valid points. Still I'd say the >balance has for a while weighed over in favour of digital cameras >(and even Tom admits he's mostly digital these days): For many purposes, including probably most purposes of people on this list, this is likely true. For specimen photography, it depends. For relatively large specimens, stuff you'd shoot with a standard macro lens with or without regular bellows, digital cameras are probably now the way to go. Perhaps I'm biased by my own needs, but for photography of small specimens - a few mm to perhaps 2 cm in dimension, really on the boundary between micro/macro (e.g., most trilobite sclerites), it's not so simple. You ideally need quite specialized lenses (many of the people currently publishing high-quality photographs of trilobites, e.g., Harry Whittington, Derek Siveter, still use a Leitz Aristophot system made in the 1950s and 1960s [fixed camera with bellows/extension tubes to 20-35 cm, focussing manually using universal stage], and Milar and Summar lenses [which close down to f48 or f96] or else the Multiphot copy made by Nikon in the 1970s and 1980s). As far as I know there is no way to use these with a digital camera (I would love to be educated if it's possible!). Photography down the barrel of standard microscopes generally yields lower quality images, with sharpness of optics and depth of field the main problems (I do have a Pixera digital camera hooked up to a Leica MZ75 trinoc, but only use it for morphometrics; years ago I shot quite a lot with a Wild Photomicroscope setup, but always got better results with Zeiss Luminar micro/macro lenses, another alternative to Summars/Milars). And, for people in this boat, resolution continues to be an issue. With 4000 dpi negative scanning, you get 5512x3675 pixel resolution of a 35 mm frame. Don't get me wrong - the sooner everything is totally digital the better, for the many reasons you list. But for some of us, I'm not sure we're quite there yet. J ________________________________________________________ Jonathan Adrain Managing Editor Assistant Professor Journal of Paleontology Department of Geoscience 121 Trowbridge Hall phone (319) 335-1539 University of Iowa fax (319) 335-1821 Iowa City, IA 52242 USA http://www.geology.uiowa.edu/faculty/adrain/adrain.html ________________________________________________________
Partial index: