RE: paleonet PDF PAPER AVAILABLE

[Earl Heather <earl@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

The problem might be solved if these "reprint broadcasts" could be submitted 
as "exceptional list traffic" to the list moderators so that the reply-to 
header is set to the sender rather than the list.

It works fine for other lists, and occurs infrequently enough here to be of 
little burden to the moderators, if they are in agreement (also stops this  
debate each time).

Failure to submit properly then warrants ...........(fill in your prefered 
penalty)

hope this helps

pheather

-------------- Original message ---------------
Hi there,

Just a quick observation on Peter Ward's complaint cited below

    > Im really object to using palenet for broadcasting
    > reprints, and then having to endure all the responses.
    > Professor Peter D Ward 
I agree, but that's not the point of my writing. My experience is that when I 
press the respond button to an e-mail received from a listserver the answer 
goes to the list server, if pressing the "respond to all" it ALSO goes to the 
individual and (unless I forget) I delete the listserver address. However, in 
paleonet , the message is sent only to the listserver, independent of the 
respond choice, so I have to copy and paste the individual address (replacing 
the listserver's)................