Re: paleonet BadNewsID

["Michael Kishel" <mike@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Well let's see, we are currently ranked 18th in science education among
industrialized countries.  Looks like we are well on our way into the 20's.
Between this and competing with China and India for oil because we refuse to
stay ahead of recently third-world countries in technology we may end up
having to give up our throne one of these days in the near future.  Oh well.
I guess Rome had it's day too.

-Michael Kishel

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sally Walker" <swalker@gly.uga.edu>
To: <paleonet@nhm.ac.uk>
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 9:47 AM
Subject: paleonet BadNewsID


> 9 Nov 05, Some bad news from The York Dispatch this morning.  Some good
> news, I heard that the Dover school board was ousted in Penn.  I'll try
> to find that link.  Sally E. Walker
>
>  From The York Dispatch:
>
> Kansas schools panel favors intelligent design
> New standards redefine word 'science' in class
> JOHN HANNA The Associated Press
>
> TOPEKA, Kan. -- Critics of evolution won a big victory in Kansas with
> the adoption of new public school standards that defy mainstream views
> on the mystery of mankind's origins.
>
> The standards, approved yesterday by the state Board of Education, cast
> doubt on Darwinism and redefine the word "science" so that it's not
> limited to the search for natural explanations of phenomena.
>
> The board's 6-4 vote was lauded by intelligent design advocates, who
> helped draft the standards. Intelligent design holds that the universe
> is so complex that it must have been created by a higher power.
>
> But critics say intelligent design is merely creationism -- a literal
> reading of the Bible's story of creation -- camouflaged in scientific
> language, and it does not belong in a science curriculum. They worry
> that the vote will encourage attacks on evolution in other states.
>
> "This action is likely to be the playbook for creationism for the next
> several years," said Eugenie Scott, director of the National Center for
> Science Education in Oakland, Calif. "We can predict this fight
> happening elsewhere."
>
> Fresh criticism: The Kansas board's vote is likely to heap fresh
> national criticism on the state. In 1999, the board deleted most
> references to evolution in the science standards. That decision was
> overturned in 2001.
>
> But supporters of the new regulations say they will lead to open
> discussions.
>
> "We are being very brave. We are brave enough to have all areas
> discussed," said board member Kathy Martin, a Clay Center Republican.
> "Students will be informed and not indoctrinated."
>
> The board does not mandate what will be taught to public school
> students; that decision is left to local school boards. However, it does
> determine what students are expected to know for state assessment tests.
> The new standards will be in effect starting in 2008.
>
> Pressures: Some educators fear pressure will increase to teach less
> about evolution or more about creationism or intelligent design.
>
> "What this does is open the door for teachers to bring creationist
> arguments into the classroom and point to the standards and say it's
> OK," said Jack Krebs, an Oskaloosa High School math teacher and vice
> president of Kansas Citizens for Science, which opposes the changes.
>
> The new standards say high school students must understand major
> evolutionary concepts. But they also declare that the basic Darwinian
> theory -- that all life had a common origin and that natural chemical
> processes created the building blocks of life -- have been challenged in
> recent years by fossil evidence and molecular biology.
>
> In addition, the board rewrote the definition of science, so that it is
> no longer limited to the search for natural explanations of phenomena.
>
>