Re: paleonet BadNewsID

[Dinogeorge@xxxxxxx]

In a message dated 11/9/2005 9:13:51 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,  
swalker@gly.uga.edu writes:

>>In addition, the board rewrote the definition of science, so  that it is 
no longer limited to the search for natural explanations of  phenomena.<<

I've got news for them. Science is >not< limited to "natural  explanations of 
phenomena." It's just that there is >not a shred of  evidence< for 
supernatural explanations, and a >great deal of evidence<  for charlatanism and 
chicanery and superstition and gullibility among those who  propose such explanations. 
As soon as true evidence for supernatural phenomena  is documented, science 
will pursue it. There is no need to rewrite definitions  of science, 
particularly by those who know nothing about science.