[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
It's not exactly bad naming. The names were meant to imply a general appearance, not relatedness. Just by chance, it is the ones that were not named bird-hipped that turned out to be the ones related to birds. At 09:49 AM 4/12/2005, you wrote: >Everyone seems to agree on the matter of relationship, but this question >needs a little more explanation for the non-specialist and especially for >students without any background. People who teach will be faced with >answering similar questions from students and a summary of basics would be >appreciated. > >If birds have a saurischian hipped skeletal structure, is the 'bird >hipped' skeletal structure of the onithischians a case of bad naming, or >has the hip structure of the saurischians changed significantly over the >course of evolution? >If it is a case of bad naming, what was the reason for the poor choice of >terms? > >Note that this question does not relate to determining relationship, it >relates to understanding the appropriateness of names and the reason for >the confusing names that have been used in discussing the hip structure of >group names of dinosaurs and birds. A short answer to this type of >question will quickly satisfy students and will make learning more than >simple memorization of terms. > > T. Yancey > > > > >>You've got it essentially correct. Birds are descendants of small >>theropods making them dinosaurs themselves. Theropods are saurischians >>but the "lizard hipness" of the entire group was not meant to imply >>relatedness, just similarity. The very birdlike non-bird theropods >>weren't well known at the time of the origin of the word saurischian and, >>as it turns out, their hips are more birdlike than the ornithischians. >> >>-Carl >> >>At 09:58 AM 4/11/2005, you wrote: >>>If I understand it correctly, birds are thought to be closely related >>>(derived from or cousins with) the small theropod dinosaurs. But >>>theropods are part of sauriscia, the "lizard hipped" clad. Are ave hips >>>really like ornithicia ? Is there a disconnect here, or are my >>>understanding of dinosaur clads incorrect. >>> >>>(Forgive my spelling) >>> >>>Am I being to simple minded here ? >>> >>> >>>Al McCarrick >> >>Carl Mehling >>Fossil Amphibian, Reptile, and Bird Collections >>Division of Paleontology >>American Museum of Natural History >>Central Park West @79th Street >>New York, NY 10024 >>(212) 769-5849 >>Fax: (212) 769-5842 >>cosm@amnh.org > > Carl Mehling Fossil Amphibian, Reptile, and Bird Collections Division of Paleontology American Museum of Natural History Central Park West @79th Street New York, NY 10024 (212) 769-5849 Fax: (212) 769-5842 cosm@amnh.org
Partial index: