[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
You've got it essentially correct. Birds are descendants of small theropods making them dinosaurs themselves. Theropods are saurischians but the "lizard hipness" of the entire group was not meant to imply relatedness, just similarity. The very birdlike non-bird theropods weren't well known at the time of the origin of the word saurischian and, as it turns out, their hips are more birdlike than the ornithischians. -Carl At 09:58 AM 4/11/2005, you wrote: >If I understand it correctly, birds are thought to be closely related >(derived from or cousins with) the small theropod dinosaurs. But >theropods are part of sauriscia, the "lizard hipped" clad. Are ave hips >really like ornithicia ? Is there a disconnect here, or are my >understanding of dinosaur clads incorrect. > >(Forgive my spelling) > >Am I being to simple minded here ? > > >Al McCarrick Carl Mehling Fossil Amphibian, Reptile, and Bird Collections Division of Paleontology American Museum of Natural History Central Park West @79th Street New York, NY 10024 (212) 769-5849 Fax: (212) 769-5842 cosm@amnh.org
Partial index: