[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Burrowing is a problem - but one that effects proponents of the impact hypothesis more than its critics. The Danish boundary sections of Stvens Klint and Nye Klov are extensively burrowed (see Tony Ekdale's paper in the Copenhagen K/T symposium volume), but these successions exhibit a single Ir anomaly. The multiple anomalies at Brazos and Braggs are lithostratigraphically too far apart to be the result of burrowing. Remember, these are anomalies, they stand up above the background variation like skyscrapers in the middle of the a wheat field. Certainly, more work needs to be done on the whole question of burrowing across the K/T boundary. Ekdale's work, along with Svarda's recent Geology paper on bioturbation in the Gulf Coast K/T sections provides a good start. Norm MacLeod ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Norman MacLeod Senior Scientific Officer N.MacLeod@nhm.ac.uk (Internet) N.MacLeod@uk.ac.nhm (Janet) Address: Dept. of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD Office Phone: 071-938-9006 Dept. FAX: 071-938-9277 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partial index: