| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
The plural nominative of dissertatio should be ,IIRC, dissertationes; however the form "nomen dissertatio " is a bit unconvincing. My poor and untrained latin may suggest something like "nomen e(or ex) dissertatione" underlining the fact that the name "comes" (literally, since e/ex + ablative is used to indicate the real or metaphorical provenance of something from somewhere ) from a dissertation. hope it helps Filippo Calzolari ----- Original Message ----- From: <Dinogeorge@aol.com> To: <dinosaur@usc.edu> Sent: Saturday, November 03, 2001 9:58 PM Subject: paleonet Dinosaur Genera List corrections #176 > I recently received a copy of Dan Chure's dissertation on Allosaurus from > University Microfilms International. In it he defines and diagnoses three new > taxa: Alashansaurus n. gen. for the species Chilantaisaurus maortuensis; > Szechuanoraptor dongi n. gen. et sp. for a skeleton previously referred to > Szechuanosaurus campi; and Allosaurus jimmadseni n.sp. for the marvelous > Dinosaur National Monument skeleton that for a couple of years remained > headless. Also on p. 226 he publishes the museum label name Allosaurus > robustus for an Australian allosauroid specimen. Dan's dissertation is the > most thorough and up-to-date study of the genus Allosaurus ever produced, and > it is a must-have document, at least until its contents are published in a > scientific journal or some other scientific venue. > > As I perused the dissertation, I got to thinking about whether or not such > dissertation names should be considered as published. The International Code > of Zoological Nomenclature expressly excludes dissertations from their > definition of a publication, so there is no question that the above taxa, > despite their documentation in the dissertation and its subsequent > distribution, are not available as scientific names. But the Dinosaur Genera > List has a broader definition of what constitutes a published dinosaur name. > Clearly, such documents as emails, Internet websites, interoffice memoranda, > scientists' notebooks, private conference abstracts, manuscripts, > limited-distribution preprints, and so forth are not publications. Neither > are dissertations limited to a few personal and library copies. But when a > dissertation becomes available to >anyone< with $31 through University > Microfilms International, in endless multiple copies produced from a single > master, this is publication. An essential part of the concept of publication > is availability and distribution, and the Dinosaur Genera List deems printed > documents available freely or by purchase to any interested readers, in > multiple identical copies, to be publications. The method of printing is not > relevant, as long as a more or less permanent paper copy is produced; the > availability is. > > Accordingly, I have set up a new category of dinosaur name, the nomen > dissertatio, for dinosaur names appearing in dissertations that are made > available to all through services such as University Microfilms > International. Such names are not scientifically available, so they are a > kind of nomen nudum, or vernacular name. If the name created in a > dissertation is later formally published, then its listing would change from > a nomen dissertatio to that of an available scientific name. Should the > dissertation name change on publication, the name would remain in the List, > but with a pointer to the correct scientific name. The year of publication is > the year the dissertation was made available through the publication service, > not necessarily the year the dissertation was completed. > > Incidentally, my Latin is not good enough to permit me to settle on the > designation nomen dissertatio. If someone can suggest a better or more > appropriate term, then I'll change it by all means. Also, what would the > plural of nomen dissertatio be? Nomina --what? > > So names #926 and 927 of the Dinosaur Genera List become: > > Alashansaurus Chure, 2001 [nomen dissertatio] > Szechuanoraptor Chure, 2001 [nomen dissertatio] > > Adding the new taxa to the forthcoming second printing of Mesozoic Meanderings > #3 will require some dismantling and rearranging of the listings for > Allosaurus and Chilantaisaurus, as put forth in the dissertation. This I > haven't yet finished, so I cannot present them here. > > If anybody knows of other dissertations that contain new dinosaur names >and< > that are available as described above, I would like to hear from you. It is > my aim to make the Dinosaur Genera List as complete as possible in this > respect. >
Partial index: