| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
I'm also one of those alluded to by Norm who voted for sci.bio.paleo (because I feel palaeontology needs more exposure to the public), but I also feel we should not gateway PaleoNet to it, for reasons already elaborated upon in previous postings. How about shelving the discussion about linking PaleoNet to sci.bio.paleo for the time being, and wait and see how the latter shapes up? I understand that several subscribers to PaleoNet will also read sci.paleo, so let's wait for a month or two before taking a decision... -- Florin Neumann florin@quartz.geology.utoronto.ca
Partial index: