| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Let's get really out there--palaeoooooology. Yum, yum. Judith judith harris emerita professor university of colorado museum p.o. box 278 chama, nm 87520 harrisj@valornet.com On Sep 12, 2006, at 7:00 AM, Leigh Van Valen wrote: > Like Jere, I think 'palaeooology' is too gorgeous to lose. 'Zoology' > lost its dieresis long ago. > -Leigh > >> Hi every body, >> >> Thank you very much for your emails. >> >> I totally agree that for practical reasons we should shorten the as >> much as we can, as well as all the different variables (Palaeoology, >> Paleooology,Paleoölogy, and Paleooölogy) should appear in the >> dictionary... >> >> By accident like evolution works, we are witnessing and contributing >> to the legal and official birth of a new scientific area. >> >> Thank you very much, indeed! >> >> >> >> Respectfully, >> >> Xavier Panades I Blas >> 55, Marksbury Road >> Bedminster >> Bristol BS3 5JY >> England (EC) >> >> http://www.acs.bolton.ac.uk/~xp1pls/ > >
Partial index: