Re: paleonet Welcome to The Palaeo-oological Discussion Group

[Leigh Van Valen <leigh@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Like Jere, I think 'palaeooology' is too gorgeous to lose.  'Zoology'
lost its dieresis long ago.
  -Leigh

>Hi every body,
>
>Thank you very much for your emails.
>
>I totally agree that for practical reasons we should shorten the as
>much as we can, as well as all the different variables (Palaeoology,
>Paleooology,Paleoölogy, and Paleooölogy) should appear in the
>dictionary...
>
>By accident like evolution works, we are witnessing and contributing
>to the legal and official birth of a new scientific area.
>
>Thank you very much, indeed!
>
>
>
>Respectfully,
>
>Xavier Panades I Blas
>55, Marksbury Road
>Bedminster
>Bristol BS3 5JY
>England (EC)
>
>http://www.acs.bolton.ac.uk/~xp1pls/