[Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Date Index]

[Off-topic?] Re: paleonet Paleonet list/newsgroup versus Paleonet forum



Hi all,

I hate to disagree, but I must.  There are many active listservs dedicated to ID, creationism, etc., of which talk.origins is among the best ( http://www.talkorigins.org/ ).  And I strongly recommend them.

But those broad listservs do not focus primarily on paleontological issues, of which many of our threads here are.  Let's face it, biologists, astronomers, chemists, ecologists (creationism almost never shows up on the ecolog listserv), and many soft-rock geologists deal with evolution in their work, but it's either ancillary (applied, as in biostratigraphy), using living organisms (which can be "seen living today" and therefore thought to be more "factual"), or so saturated in math (most of astronomy and biology) that it's a different issue.  For example, most creationists (at least the savvier ones) are fine with microevolution.  Almost all of my students can rationalize natural selection acting on populations.

But the reason evolution (as seen by paleontologists) is almost always going to be held in greater doubt by the public is because of the deep time element.  This really is distinct from most other disciplines that deal with evolution as a routine matter.  And so while I could understand (and would surely join) a separate listserv for "paleontologists-defending-evolution," I really think it belongs here on paleonet.

Basically, I really do think we have a bigger battle to fight than most.  And the decline of paleontology does not bode well for this, especially since most evolutionary biologists (our sister group) don't consider deep time.  And this is even more important since there are legitimate issues that paleontologists and biologists do argue over (and that add further fuel to the creationist's fire).

As always, I'm speaking from my own experience.  But I hear it's a big problem elsewhere too.

Phil

At 04:31 AM 3/29/2005, you wrote:
The question is not  "which sort of ms do I want to read?" nor "shall we keep on getting ms about evolution vs. creationism?" ...
Regarding the first question, I fully support Jere H. Lipps's Opinion, that is "(...) the talk about vertebrates, most inverts, email requests, equipment, etc, not what I want to read either.  But it is all part of being a community."
Regarding the 2nd question, I just wonder whether an issue generating more than 20 ms weekly is well suited for a Newsgroup/List (that should have been the original question!) or if it deserves a dedicated Forum (taht is a possible answer!) ...
In my opinion, the discussion about "evolution vs. creationism" is generating too many ms to be part of a Newsgroup/List! There are many tools / facilities (PHP, Perl, ASP, ... some are eventually available as freewares) to build such a Forum ... I believe your IT (Information Technology) people can help you to build it!
Any volunteer?

BG

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
                                   NOTE NEW CONTACT INFORMATION
  Phil Novack-Gottshall                        pnovackg@westga.edu                      
 
  Assistant Professor                        
  Department of Geosciences          
"Do not be too moral.  You may cheat
  University of West Georgia               yourself out of much of life.  Aim above
  Carrollton, GA                                      morality.  Be not simply good; be good
  30118-3100                                         for something."
  Phone: 678-839-4061                         -- H.D. Thoreau
  Fax: 678-839-4071
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~