[Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Date Index]

Re: paleonet Dinosaur Genera List update #187



Great idea!  Let's just let use dictate, then we are free of the ICZN.  We don't need rules!  We can just get all our friends to do it our way.  Later on, we can all get together again and change it to whatever is popular then.  In a few years, it won't make any difference what it was since no one will have any idea of what it means. 

The dinosaur community, in spite of some dinosaurologists, does not operate in its own little world.  Their names impact all of zoology in that they are no longer available.  I hope the dinosaurologists check the rest of the zoological literature as well, just to make sure that some renegade bunch of snail people don't get together and all use some dino-name.  I can just see Tyrannosaurus rex, king of the slugs, rising in the mollusk world by popular usage.

At 12:30 PM 7/26/02 -0400, you wrote:
>In a message dated 7/25/02 9:36:36 PM Pacific Daylight Time, forams@flash.net
>writes:
>
><< In other words, the original name Richardoestesia has to stand, and any
>proposed
> change to it (i.e., Ricardoestesia) by a First Reviewer simply becomes a
>junior
> synonym.  I'm afraid you're stuck with Richardoestesia.
> >>
>
>The name appears spelled both ways in the original article, therefore there
>is indeed evidence of a typographical error within the paper and not from any
>external source. The problem is which is the error and which is the correct
>spelling. As first revisor I chose the predominant spelling Richardoestesia,
>but I was later informed that the intended spelling was Ricardoestesia (see
>Dinosaur Genera List corrections #187). The only way to change the spelling
>to the authors' intended spelling is to inform the dinosaur community of the
>intended spelling and request that the intended spelling be used from now on,
>regardless of the action of the first revisor. The intended spelling is in
>the literature in several publications, so it already carries some weight.
>The object is to continue using the intended spelling until it predominates
>in the literature and thereby becomes the accepted spelling.
>