Re: paleonet WARNING final comments

[Lakeneosho@xxxxxxx]

Greetings

I said I wasn't going to continue the thread on this subject.  However,
I just read the email from Janice McCafferty who obviously thinks that
I was implying that she was somehow involved.

As looking back at the original email where I said "It looked like it was
coming from Janice who has a web site"  --- and later I did make 
a comment about who ever did this was on the lower level of 
the food chain.  I never thought Janice was involved.  I do stand
by the "lower end of the food chain" remark about whoever sent it.

The intention was to illustrate that someone was using parts of valid
information to disguise themselves.  In other words ... the From: 
section of the email appeared "similar" to Janice's email and the
names following that email address was valid.  So who ever sent
the email, or virus, or computer generated ... this or that --- did
so in a way to give the appearance that the email was valid.

To set the record straight for Janice and all members ... I knew it
wasn't coming from Janice!  The next attack could very will be
sent to someone else using part of MY email address and adding
MY name at the end.  I only was passing along what I hoped to be
base information about the events of the day including the reply
attack I got right after sending the warning.

To Janice specifically ... I apologize for the impression I gave that
I thought you were involved.  To any list member who got the same
impression ... the same apology.

Barry