[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
On Mon, 18 Mar 1996, N. MacLeod wrote: > As with the mess extinction debates in the fossil record, the real nub of > the problem is trying to figure out what proportion of extinctions were due > to "exogenous" causes (e.g., human activities) and what proportion would > have come about as a result of "normal" factors. Hi Norm, While I know you are trying to make an important distinction here, I fail to see the difference between these two causes as humans are merely part of the natural world. What I'm trying to say, is that the humans' technological advances are merely an extension of their "normal" capability. If human technology was not meant to be part of the evolution of natural history, perhaps it would not been part of our "design" to advance technologically. Perhaps, if we destroy our selves and the living world with us, then this would be natures' way of ridding the planet of a species that couldn't adapt!
Partial index: