[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
The thing that strikes me about the current "Are we in a mass extinction?" debate is that no one seems to be paying much attention to the types of organisms that are going extinct in the last few decades. The ones I keep hearing about would have very little chance of being preserved in the fossil record. Thus, there is a built-in scaling problem when people try to compare the current biodiversity crisis to those of the past. However, if we take a longer view and add in the Pleistocene extinctions as the first of a series of waves of biodiversity reductions that have affected the modern biota, then we do achieve at least a rough comparability. As with the mess extinction debates in the fossil record, the real nub of the problem is trying to figure out what proportion of extinctions were due to "exogenous" causes (e.g., human activities) and what proportion would have come about as a result of "normal" factors. I think it is somewhat simplistic to attribute all extinctions that are currently taking place to be the result of any one factor (e.g., human activity). Even more dangerously, acceptance of the "humans must have done it" argument means that no one needs to look for any other answer. To my mind this means that many modern extinction events remain unexplained. I'm not saying that I think human are blameless when it comes to causing modern extinctions, they certainly are not as a number of very well documented studies have shown. [Note my personal favorite is Peter Mathiessan's (name not spelled correctly) book "Wildlife in America" which documents the decline and extinction of the North American fauna/flora since colonial times.] Rather, I am disturbed by the "knee-jerk" interpretation of all modern extinction as man-related regardless of the quality of the evidence available. Going back to the Pleistocene example, man may have had a hand in driving some of the large Pleistocene mammals to extinction, but climate change was certainly going on, large changes in many (if not most) animal ranges were taking place, and I have a hard time picturing early man being responsible for changes in vole biodiversity and/or distributional patterns (for example). Norm MacLeod ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Norman MacLeod Senior Scientific Officer N.MacLeod@nhm.ac.uk (Internet) N.MacLeod@uk.ac.nhm (Janet) Address: Dept. of Palaeontology, The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD Office Phone: 0171-938-9006 Dept. FAX: 0171-938-9277 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Partial index: