[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
>So here is the question for you to kick around: Based on our knowledge >of mass extinctions and recoveries -life has always managed to recover, >including the big one (Permian/Triassic)- how concerned is the >paleontological community regarding the current 'mass extinction'? As a paleontologist I think this current perturbation will have been repaired by evolution in a few million years. As a living creature on this planet, I don't like the idea of mass extinctions. It causes a lot of trouble for us, right? In an analysis of migration histories of planktic (!) foraminifera in the Atlantic I learned that biogeographic radiation of species takes between 100 Ka to millions of years. These time scales are valid even when only existing species shall replace the extinct ones. The time scales may be different for terrestrial organisms, but 10 Ka are still long enough for the human species. Considering the decay time of plutonium (about 50 Ka), the human impact on biodiversity may have time-scales similar to radioactive waste. As a geologist I would say the same amount of thinking, planning, and money (as for radioactive waste disposal sites) should be invested before human activity leads to extinction of species. Maybe even more. We know, radioactivity is unhealthy. The role of most species on Earth, however, is basically unknown. Norm wrote: >The thing that strikes me about the current "Are we in a mass extinction?" >debate is that no one seems to be paying much attention to the types of >organisms that are going extinct in the last few decades. The ones I keep >hearing about would have very little chance of being preserved in the >fossil record. That's the point. I hear about changes in the circum-Antanrctic plankton (including diatoms) through increases in UV radiation in response to the ozone hole. The acid rain over the South Atlantic through biomass burning in the Amazon Basin is dramatic and affects the marine plankton ecosystem. Things are getting to a point where future paleontologists may really see something. Paleontologists should tell the public about the time scales of extinction. What, if stone-age people would have spread their toxic waste over the planet and we would still be killed when we find a disposal site? How will later generations think about disturbed water cycles, extreme variability in non-equilibrium ecosystems, acceleation of climate change, or reduced natural resources (genetics, food)? They may not be happy with us. Heinz Hilbrecht Address: Heinz Hilbrecht Geological Institute ETH Zentrum Sonneggstr. 5 CH-8092 Zuerich Switzerland phone: ++41-1-6323676 fax: ++41-1-6321080 WWW: http://eurasia.ethz.ch/~heinz/ e-mail: Hilbrecht@erdw.ethz.ch
Partial index: