[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Mime-Version: 1.0 Date: Wed, 10 Jan 1996 15:10:21 -0500 To: paleonet-owner@nhm.ac.uk From: bivalve@email.unc.edu (David Campbell) Subject: Re: Errors in Jurassic Park (Movie) (posted for D. Campbell) Status: O The assertion that eucalyptus, etc. would not be especially good to eat is based on the assorted toxins which discourage modern herbivores. Koalas manage by eating a little of several different species and still are probably somewhat drugged by their diet. It seems unlikely that brachiosaurs would have adaptations to deal with plant toxins which evolved in the Cretaceous or Cenozoic. Grasses are generally high in cellulose and silica, and diversified relatively recently. Stachytarpheta belongs to a family generally high in toxins, though I've not seen any analysis of that genus. Also, it doesn't particularly matter whether the movie is close to being accurate for me to notice scientific incompetence. However, in the case of Jurassic Park, part of the advertising was the claim that this was science, not science fiction. David Campbell "old seashells" Department of Geology CB 3315 Mitchell Hall University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill Chapel Hill NC 27599-3315 bivalve@email.unc.edu
Partial index: