[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
In response to Una Smith's piece on usenet groups, I'd be very much against linking paleonet with a usenet group. The good thing about a mailing list is that it can be moderated -- usenet groups are not. My experience of the anthropology usenet group (for example) is that it tends to get swamped with ill-informed crankiness and is generally of little use to professionals. It all depends on what you want. Public education is a lofty motive, but access to paleonet is (as far as I am aware) open to all, right now. It should remain a network for professionals. Enthusiasts have their own lists such as 'dinosaur' which, I hear, is a source of frustration and disk overload to all but the dedicated few. The great thing about email and the internet is that you can have both, or neither, according to your needs and tastes. You don't have to link paleonet with the usenet, which (for me) would be detrimental to paleonet. If you want the usenet as well, you can -- there's nothing to stop you subscribing to both, provided that you don't force *everyone* to do the same. -- Henry Gee ------------------------------------------------------------ Nature, henry@chiswick.demon.co.uk 4 Little Essex Street, naturelondon@mcimail.com London WC2R 3LF nature@naturedc.com tel +44 171 836 6633 x 2473 fax +44 171 836 9934 ------------------------------------------------------------
Partial index: