[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
I largely agree with Jere regarding the role of paleontology in analyzing mass extinctions - although I think this is largely true for what Underwood termed "pulse" events - very rapid catastrophic events. This may not be true for "press" events which have a longer duration. In contrast to Stanley's recent Science Paper, I think the P/Tr was a rather prolongued event, with a very rapid extinction pulse close to the apparent P/Tr boundary. The F/F seems to be a series of several stepped extinctions, whether press or pulse isn't really clear. This distinction may also have important implication s for the nature of the recoveries following mass extinctions. Doug Erwin
Partial index: