[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Very important point. Recovery is more interesting than extinction, but not as exciting or Time-ly. >I largely agree with Jere regarding the role of paleontology in analyzing >mass extinctions - although I think this is largely true for what Underwood >termed "pulse" events - very rapid catastrophic events. This may not be >true for "press" events which have a longer duration. In contrast to Stanley's >recent Science Paper, I think the P/Tr was a rather prolongued event, with >a very rapid extinction pulse close to the apparent P/Tr boundary. The >F/F seems to be a series of several stepped extinctions, whether press or >pulse isn't really clear. This distinction may also have important implication >s for the nature of the recoveries following mass extinctions. >Doug Erwin Jere H. Lipps Professor, Department of Integrative Biology Director, Museum of Paleontology University of California at Berkeley Berkeley, CA 94720 510-642-9006 fax 642-1822 jlipps@ucmp1.berkeley.edu
Partial index: