| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
These days, geology departments seem to be advertising for "geobiologists"
as a shorthand for either
(1) "paleontologists"
or
(2) "interdisciplinary folks interested in the biological
mediation of geological processes (and sometimes vice versa)"
But usually the position is aimed at just one of these groups, not both.
As for Blackwell's journal, I have to assume that the latter connotation
(i.e., Earth systems processes) will be the journal's focus.
So, as a point of general discussion: Is it useful/beneficial for
paleontologists to identify as geobiologists in a time when this
growing subdiscipline's focus (if it can be said to have one) is
diverging from mainstream paleontology?
Peter A. Kaplan * Peter A. Kaplan * Peter A. Kaplan * Peter A. Kaplan
* Ph. D. Candidate * Department of Geology * University of Michigan *
1511 Pine Valley Blvd UMMP, 1109 Geddes Road
Apartment 21 _______ Ann Arbor, MI 48109
Ann Arbor, MI 48104 / retep ; phone: 734.764.0489
734.975.4331 ;______/ fax: 781.723.0267
@..@ /
(-==-)
( >__< ) pefty@aya.yale.edu
~~ ^^ ~~
Partial index: