| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
OK. I'm confused. Earlier this week I learned that a new journal entitled (and dealing with) Geobiology was slated to be published by Blackwells soon. I've heard this term being bandied about for years, but publication of a special-topic journal suggests (to me) a certain conceptual crystalization such that geobiology could be--or should be--more-or-less distinguishable from other types of paleontology (e.g., systematic paleontology, stratigraphic paleontology, paleoecology, paleobiology). Otherwise, how do you know what type of papers to send to the journal? So, I picked up my mouse and went to the web to get a definitive definition, or perhaps even a provisional definition, of the term. Unfortunately, there doesn't seem to be much consensus out there. For some, it seems as though geobiology is linked to astrobiology somehow. Others (e.g., Carl Brett who teaches a course in geobiology at Cincinnati) think of it as a junior synonym for historical geology, with perhaps a bit more chemistry thrown in. Still others (e.g., Caltech), think of it as "the use of information preserved in and by the biosphere to attack problems of importance for understanding the geological evolution of the Earth." Of course, this is OK but that sort of definition can apply to just about anything including all of paleontology along with much of what concerns sedimentologists and oceanographers. There's even a 'Geobiology of Life' Program out there, described as "the result of forty years of combined research in microbiology, forestry, and herbal nutrition, along with diverse experience through the studies of metaphysics, the Far East and American Indian shamanism. Consequently, my question is what (if anything) is geobiology and how is it related to the other branches of paleontology? The last major conceptual revolution in paleontology--leaving aside punctuated equilibria and its descendants--was the paleobiology movement of late 60's and 70's. This movement, spearheaded by T. J. M. Schopf, Steve Gould, David Raup, and others, gave paleontology a renewed interest in speciation dynamics, extinction studies, biodiversity studies, functional morphology and a generally more quantitative/statistical approach to the analysis of all types of paleontological data. Is geobiology the same sort of thing? If so, what conceptual issues does it take as its own? Last, but not least, does geobiology appeal to students more readily than historical geology, sedimentology, oceanography, etc? If so, why? Norm MacLeod -- ___________________________________________________________________________ Dr. Norman MacLeod Keeper of Palaeontology The Natural History Museum, Cromwell Road, London, SW7 5BD (0)20-7942-5204 (Office) (0)20-7942-5546 (Fax) N.MacLeod@nhm.ac.uk (e-mail) Web Page: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/palaeontology/a&ss/nm/nm.html NHM Palaeo. Dept. BURP Update: http://www.nhm.ac.uk/palaeontology/burp.html ___________________________________________________________________________
Partial index: