| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Dear Jere, Thanks for the advice. The thread may still serve an educational purpose, if only to show (1) tension, and (2) personal invective intruding on a rational discourse. For high school students unfamiliar with scientists or amateurs so hyped about their ideas, it can be instructive to expose them to such arguments. My course will unfold the paleo story of whales elaborated over the past 20 years, saving the most recent discovery until after an analyssis of the molecular data. There are papers from the mid and late 90s that attempt to synthesize both data sets. As I recall, some weaknesses in molecular data came from a failure to analyze the specific base positions that lead to strange teees. Nonetheless, the molecular people did make the right call on whales' closest sister group, even before the fossil was found to confirm the connection. Your old LA school buddy, Rod Mitchell (maybe different first name then - hung out with Ed Mitchell - no relation - as well) has moved from our high school dept. to the University of Puget Sound (http://www.ups.edu/biology/faculty/mitchell.htm). Speaking of whales, he was Larry Barnes's high school teacher in Colorado. Tom DeVries Thomas J. DeVries Adjunct Research Associate Burke Museum of Natural History and Culture University of Washington Seattle, WA 98195 USA tomdevrie@aol.com
Partial index: