| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
>They have. It was. The palaeontologists refused to consider or mention to >the public the theory based on the best line of evidence. > >You have enough time to study whatever it is you want, I have enough time >to >deal with the corruption and incompetence that I see reducing the sciences >I >am interested in to an absurd parody, in some cases by workers sponsored by >me. Science is an interesting field. While there are many good scientists who work very diligently and try to incorporate and explain data from many different sources, there always seem to be a few bad eggs who are convinced that their way must be the only way to do things. This is a real shame since nearsightedness a negative to science. Perhaps rather than trying to insult and demean paleontologists, Mr. Jackson should try to be more constructive and work with a paleontologist on trying to incorporate both fossil and molecular data. Adam _________________________________________________________________ Join the world’s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. http://www.hotmail.com
Partial index: