| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Interesting that a volume on Fossils of the Chalk should blandly overlook the coccoliths, of which the Chalk is essentially composed. Surely a mention, a few images.. ? Maurice Black so soon forgotten? We only considered fossils visible to the human eye, you explain. Optocentric bias, I calls it. John Van Couvering nothing to do of course with Editor, Micropaleontology Press At 11:10 AM 8/22/2002 +0100, you wrote: >The Palaeontological Association's latest volume in the 'Field Guides to >Fossils' series is a revised and enlarged edition of the 'Fossils of the >Chalk. There are separate chapters on: sponges, corals, serpulids, >bryozoans, brachiopods, bivalves, gastropods, ammonites, nautiloids, >arthropods, echinoderms, fishes, and reptiles. > >Full reference details are: > >Fossils of the Chalk; 2nd ed., revised and enlarged. Edited by AB Smith >and DJ Batten. 374 pp; 66 pls; 33 text-figs. ISBN 0-901702-78-1; ISSN >0962-5321. Published by The Palaeontological Association; price £14.00, >$28.00, €28.00. Available from <palass@palass.org> and: > >Tim Palmer > > > >Dr Tim Palmer C.Geol., F.G.S. >Executive Officer, The Palaeontological Association >I.G.E.S., University of Wales >Aberystwyth SY23 3DB >Wales, U.K. > >Phone/Answerphone: +44 (0) 1970 627107 >Fax: +44 (0) 1970 622659 >Secretary: +44 (0) 1970 622643 >E-mail: palass@palass.org >Web: www.palass.org
Partial index: