| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
In a message dated 96-04-04 06:55:02 EST, you write: >Sorry Tom, but I can't let this sort of disinformation go by unchallenged. Rest deleted forr brevity! The loud sound of backpeddling.... First I must apologize for the way I composed my post regarding Mike's opinion on the K-T impact. I was pressed for time and rushed a (too) quick and sad attempt at a generalized summary of what Norm has rightly called "a complex" issue. After rereading the aformentoned post I was just as appalled at the way I came across. My attempts a demostrating a _possible_ relationship between an impact and the ecological consequences was feeble and I included the wrong group of mammals (placentals) when I meant to say marsupials to say the least. So before, any more of you have a baby, I retract the post, apologize for _unintended_ "disinformation" and vow to never " bang out a blurb and run " again. I still do howver, accept the impact as the probable culprit of the K-T extinctions, and repectfully disagree at that point. I stand thoroughly chastised! Regards, Thomas R. Lipka Paleontological/Geological Studies
Partial index: