| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
In a few instances, the paleo community has already dealt with the modern issuance of privately produced works. Furthermore, I'll bet all those naturalists of the 18th century would have had their privately-published work up on the Web in a flash, had it been available. I don't think anyone had their work formally reviewed by their peers, yet we have no problem citing Linne, Lamarck, etc. The issue with privately produced Web pages, and updated Web pages, is not their scientific validity or the awkwardness in citing them, but their permanence. Again, in my opinion, unless Web pages or electronic publications, journal or otherwise, are distributed through predictable and reliable sources (i.e., libraries and their Web pages), the electronic material will have to carry some sort of special identifier in the same category as personal communication, although as argued previously, a designator such as "Internet communication, ...." would be better.
Partial index: