Re: Returned mail: User unknown

[hrlane@xxxxxxxxx]

Item Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
Received: from hou.amoco.com (earth) by houeosm1 with SMTP
	(1.37.109.11/16.2) id AA118672368; Wed, 28 Dec 1994 18:52:49 -0600
Received: from netserv2 by hou.amoco.com (4.1/SMI-4.1)
	id AA12184; Wed, 28 Dec 94 18:52:34 CST
Received: from interlock.amoco.com (portal.trc.amoco.com) by netserv2 (4.1/SMI-4.0)
	id AA21908; Wed, 28 Dec 94 18:52:39 CST
Received: from nhm.ac.uk (mailserver.nhm.ac.uk) by portal.amoco.com with SMTP id AA03122
  (InterLock SMTP Gateway 1.1); Wed, 28 Dec 1994 18:52:30 -0600
Received: (from root@localhost) by nhm.ac.uk (8.6.9/8.6.9) id AAA21599 for paleonet-outgoing; Thu, 29 Dec 1994 00:55:31 GMT
Received: from ucmp1.Berkeley.EDU (ucmp1.Berkeley.EDU [128.32.146.30]) by nhm.ac.uk (8.6.9/8.6.9) with SMTP id AAA21594 for <paleonet@nhm.ac.uk>; Thu, 29 Dec 1994 00:55:27 GMT
Received: from [128.32.146.82] (ucmp3.Berkeley.EDU) by ucmp1.Berkeley.EDU (4.1/1.31)
	id AA16967; Wed, 28 Dec 94 16:57:49 PST
Date: Wed, 28 Dec 94 16:57:49 PST
Message-Id: <9412290057.AA16967@ucmp1.Berkeley.EDU>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
To: paleonet@nhm.ac.uk
From: jlipps@ucmp1.Berkeley.EDU (Jere H. Lipps)
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
Sender: owner-paleonet@nhm.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: paleonet@nhm.ac.uk

.......................................................................

Item Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
     I don't know about Shell, but Amoco just reduced its VP level by 
     17 out of a total I believe of fortysomething.  Pretty 
     siignificant, huh?  Remember, Jere, industry is at the front end 
     of the money-chain. What we generate, we earn. We pay taxes to 
     the government so that it can be passed on to those claiming to 
     do research.  Money is not handed to industry by a government, or 
     some other funding agency.  Academics don't need to worry about 
     world competition.  They just need to select the next place for 
     their sabatical.    


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
Author:  paleonet-owner (paleonet-owner@nhm.ac.uk) at unix,in
Date:    12/28/94 6:57 PM


I am sorry to continue to clutter up PaleoNet, but it looks like Shell Oil
Co. is now saving money by returning email directed to their employees.
Another example of meanness in corporations??   Or just another corporate
screw-up, like so many others that cost them and us lots of money.  [Oh,
did ya hear the news this morning about the average salary for CEOs in
America.  For Wall Streeters its just over $1-mill/yr, and it goes down
from there just a bit in other industries.  I wonder what the top guys
make, and the poor suckers at the bottom that drag the average down.
Sorry, I missed the oil industry part, but they must be making a bundle for
all those wise decisions they've made lately.  Anyone know if the oil CEOs
have been downsized yet?  Can't just be paleontologists!]

If you are still out there Mike Styzen, you might tell your postmaster that
you are still at Shell, unless he/she/it knows something you don't!   Maybe
you should stop sending those messages--could be the postmaster reads
PaleoNet.

Here's what I tried to get past your system to you:

Jere

>Date: Wed, 28 Dec 94 18:06:08 -0600
>From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@shell.com>
>Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
>To: postmaster@shell.com
>To: jlipps@ucmp1.Berkeley.EDU
>
>   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>550 mstyzen... User unknown
>
>   ----- Unsent message follows -----
>Received: by shellgate.shell.com SHELLGATE-I1.3 id AA07039; Wed, 28 Dec 94
>18:06:08 -0600
>Received: from ucmp1.Berkeley.EDU by uu5.psi.com (5.65b/4.0.071791-PSI/PSINet)
>via SMTP;
>        id AA20388 for mstyzen; Wed, 28 Dec 94 18:43:31 -0500
>Received: from [128.32.146.82] (ucmp3.Berkeley.EDU) by ucmp1.Berkeley.EDU
>(4.1/1.31)
>        id AA15997; Wed, 28 Dec 94 15:50:32 PST
>Date: Wed, 28 Dec 94 15:50:32 PST
>Message-Id: <9412282350.AA15997@ucmp1.Berkeley.EDU>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>To: mstyzen@shell.com
>From: jlipps@ucmp1.Berkeley.EDU (Jere H. Lipps)
>Subject: Re: Log analysts vs Paleontologists
>Cc: nm@mailserver.nhm.ac.uk
>
>Mike:
>
>Thanks for posting your note to MicroPal.  It's pertinent to most
>micropaleo types.
>
>I didn't mean to clutter up PaleoNet with my request to you, but the
>program PaleoNet uses seems to send the replies back to the bulletin board
>rather than the originator.  MicroPal sends the replies back to the
>originator.  We use listproc software, and I forgot what PaleoNet uses.
>Anyway its confusing.  Sorry.
>
>Jere
>
>
>