| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Re Dr. Hilbrecht's comments on dust and soot on fossil specimens: dust can be surprisingly damaging over time, particularly if it is abrasive or acidic (increasingly common, sad to say). When the specimen has been treated or coated with a thermoplastic polymer, and the temperature fluctuates., dust on the surface sinks into the coating and becomes inextricably part of it, resulting in an increasingly dirty surface that can seriously impair the analysis of key characteristics (and be a real nightmare to remove). Old shellac and old beeswax are especially prone to hold dust and dirt over time and are sometimes very difficult to remove without damaging the specimen. One major project related to this that comes to mind was the cleaning of the fossils in the proboscidean hall at the University of Nebraska. Soot is a somewhat different problem because of the fineness of the particles and, of course, the potential for carbon- black staining. Sally Shelton Director, Collections Care and Conservation San Diego Natural History Museum
Partial index: