[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Hi Phil, I think the better choice is to separate real names and open nomenclature or synonynym list signs. Such signs can make a name quite complicated and a lot of additional information is added to a name e.g.: v p Agenus? cf. album so it makes sense to separate that. I have implemented this in my taxonconcept toy at http://taxonconcept.stratigraphy.net to store synonymy lists. best regarsd, Robert > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: paleonet-owner@nhm.ac.uk [mailto:paleonet-owner@nhm.ac.uk]Im > Auftrag von Phil Bock > Gesendet: Montag, 4. September 2006 14:36 > An: paleonet@nhm.ac.uk > Betreff: Re: paleonet question marks in taxonomic names > > > Yet another comment on question marks > When preparing and using digital databases, adding question marks before > the relevant name (or using quotes in some cases) makes it more > difficult to do quick alphabetic sorting. > In my own database, I push the question mark after the genus or species > as appropriate. > Of course, a purist would use a separate data field(s) for using queries > of the various types, but the design then becomes a lot more complex. > > -- > Phil Bock > mailto:philbock@bigpond.net.au > OR > mailto:philbock1@gmail.com > Bryozoa Home Page http://www.civgeo.rmit.edu.au/bryozoa/default.html > > > >
Partial index: