| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
In fact I think what would be argued in reply is the old favourite: "just because YOU don't understand why it's designed like that doesn't mean it's badly designed. The Intelligent Designer is WAY more intelligent than you and it's not surprising if you don't understand why he did things the way he did". I've had that one thrown at me in the past, I'm sure I'm not the only one. I don't really see the point of getting bogged down in the details with them - this is a non-issue, their arguments are facile and incorrect and if we start arguing details like this with them we only lend credence to their ideas by implying they're worth arguing against. Let's keep to the simple straightforward arguments that their entire idea is based on nonsense and misunderstanding, and that ID/Creationism is not science, it's faith. Breandán -- _______________________________________________ For the largest FREE email in Ireland (25MB) and 20MB of online file storage space - Visit http://www.campus.ie
Partial index: