| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
|
In a message dated 8/29/2005 9:44:46 A.M. Pacific Standard Time,
gildnerr@ipfw.edu writes:
haven't heard the argument before, but one problem that I see is the Another problem with the term "intelligent" is that we simply don't know
what it means. What looks "unintelligent" in one context could well be quite
"intelligent" in a deeper context; and, of course, vice versa. Just as there is
no end to the question, "Why?", so there is no end to the cycle "this seems
stupid," "no, it's not," "yes, it is," etc.
If there is an intelligent designer, who or what designed it? And who or
what designed the designer of the intelligent designer? And so on, ad infinitum.
And if nobody was needed to design the designer, why then is anybody needed to
design mere humans?
|
Partial index: