[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
To grossly oversimplify, the point at which American creationists chose the "wrong track" was approximately 1955-1965. At this time, two related but very different books were published. The "right track" book was Bernard Ramm's "The Christian View of Science and Scripture (1955)," which suggested several possible interpretations of Genesis that could be reconciled with modern science. The modern science part was heavily informed by Larry Kulp, a pioneer of isotope geochemistry and geochronology at Columbia and a Wheaton College grad. The "wrong track" book (now in its zillionth printing) was "The Genesis Flood (1960)," by Morris and Whitcomb, which was written partially in response to Ramm's book. It eventually led to the establishment in 1970 of the Institute for Creation Research--and the rest, as they say, is history. -John Bratton P.S. Thanks to John Suppe at Princeton for pointing out Ramm's much neglected book to me. "Peter & Nancy" <hosier@ispdr.net To: <paleonet@nhm.ac.uk> .au> cc: Sent by: Subject: paleonet Faith and skepticism paleonet-owner@nh m.ac.uk 02/14/2005 04:51 PM Please respond to paleonet Dear Bill, <snip I think the trouble with creationists is they are on the wrong track <snip>
Partial index: