[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Greetings, Flightless birds generally have thicker-walled bones than the "weight-conscious " flying birds. Compare a Kiwi bone to a similar sized or weight bird that flies, like a crow or raven and the analogy should hold. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Kleo P" <burszt@hotmail.com> To: <paleonet@nhm.ac.uk> Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 2:20 PM Subject: Re: paleonet Bird bone preservation > I've read this statement also. The author says the "bones are thicker than > those of most birds" not that they are larger--you quote it as I remember > it. I assumed this to mean that the walls of the Dodo's bones were thicker > and therefore, the bones were less airy, internally, than similar sized bone > birds tend to be. A Dodo bone the same size as the bone of a flying bird, > the Dodo bone would stand up to crushing during burial better than the other > due to the Dodo having "thicker" not bigger bones. I don't have much > background in taphonomy, though, and will have to try this for myself. > > Do you have the original source for the observation? > > I would love to have a taphonomist weigh in in detail on Paleonet or maybe a > citation? > > Kleo P. > > _________________________________________________________________ > MSN 8 with e-mail virus protection service: 2 months FREE* > http://join.msn.com/?page=features/virus >
Partial index: