[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
These are some of the most intelligent comments I have seen to date on the paleonet regarding this issue. I applaud your reasoning that has escaped so many. Best regards, Dave Giuseffi MS Paleoecology'78 and Collector of trilobites and Paleozoic echinoderms, among other things Dr Lyall I. Anderson wrote: > > Dear 'group of people with a common shared interest in > palaeontology', > > Roger Fry posted a message yesterday which got me > thinking (this is both good and constructive!). > > On Tue, 9 Sep 1997 21:08:01 -0700 (PDT) "Roger F. Fry" > <Roger_F_Fry@compuserve.com> wrote: > > > While I decry the theft and unlawful removable of specimens from the > > field, I can not and will not support a ban on the commercial sale of > > fossils. > > > > For example, I regularly collect a lot of common _Macraster sp_ (heart > > urchins) and _Neithea sp_ (scallops) and donate them to a museum for > > resale to the public (children mostly). While I may not be getting paid to > > do this voluntary collecting, I could be considered a commercial > > paleotologist as the fossils I collect are ultimately sold for a profit. > <<TEXT CUT>> > > Roger Fry > > avocational, amateur, extra academic, commercialist, crass capitalist, or > > whatever you wish to call me > > Perhaps as folk who view things from the perspective of > deep time, we should realise that ANY fossil material > which is collected be it commercially or otherwise is more > likely to come to palaeontological scrutiny EVENTUALLY, > than stuff left eroding in the field. > > POINT 1. > > Part of the problem as I see it is this. We all > have our favourite fossils that we work on. I'm guilty of > it as well with xiphosurans (horseshoe crabs). When a new > find comes to light it is all too easy to swing into > the 'THIS IS A FABULOUS RARE FIND WHICH MUST > AUTOMATICALLY FIND ITSELF TRANSPORTED TO AN ACCESSIONED > MUSEUM COLLECTION' mode. That really cheeses collectors > off and quite rightly so. They have put in the hard > graft and expense of going looking. However, careful and > tactful negotiations, perhaps with the allure of actually > working on the material alongside a palaeo worker and > finding out more about it often pays dividends. Some > collectors I know personally have drawn up wills which > state that upon their death their collections (most of > which are far better documented than my own I may add) > are to be handed over to certain museums. > > POINT 2. > > Consider. Someone who pays hard cash for fossil material > is not likely to bin their collection (unless it suddenly > disagrees with their religion) and as such, there is a > chance that this material will eventually end up in an > establishment where it can be looked at. Perhaps not by > you, perhaps not by me, but we should learn not to be > greedy as to what we can and cannot study in the short > term. Remember when we are dead and gone, with a little > good fortune (or is that better funding?) there will be a > few more generations of palaeontologists to pick up from > where we left off! The candy we can't have today might > find itself in their sticky paws.... > > Hope this strikes a chord with someone somewhere, > > Lyall > > ---------------------- > Dr Lyall I. Anderson > Dept. of Geology & Petroleum Geology > Kings College > University of Aberdeen > AB9 2UE > > Visit the Fossil Surgery... > http://members.tripod.com/~Lyall/index.html > and join the Paleo Ring.
Partial index: