[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Greetings. Just my luck: my first posting to the list, and it is a about a rather bleak subject. However, Dr MacLeod asked yesterday >Does anyone have any >current figures for employment in paleontology in particular and/or science >in general available? Not so general, but I have some. What follows are a few data about the situation in Italy, as published a few months back in a small unofficial "guide" for geology students and would-be students. Enjoy. Just for starters, consider please the following: the Italian Geological Service currently employs 40 geologists, and no further hirings are planned. Now, some figures - Between 1980 and 1992, 1124 persons took their degree (B.Sc equivalent) in Geology at the University of Rome, "La Sapienza". - Of said 1124 persons, less than 1% completed the studies in the proper 4 years of courses. The remaining 99% had to spend from 6 to 8 years instead of the expected 4. In the majority of cases, much of the extra time was spent in field work for the final degree paper. - About the 80% of said graduate students was able to find a job in his/her field of study after 2 to 4 years of expectancy. The "La Sapienza" figures can be easily extended to any other University in our country, and so are generally indicative of the Italian situation. It might seem incredible, but the above employment data are to be seen as _optimistic_; the point is that much less than 80% of graduates can wait 2 to 4 years for the right job (see below for some different figures). Also, post-graduate positions such as 3-years research doctorates, and part-time positions inside the University are taken into account here, further increasing the apparent number of satisfied geologists working in the geological field. But there's more. ISTAT, an Italian institute for statistical services published a booklet in '96, that was distributed free of charge by the university offices to both students and staff, reviewing a shorter term situation (3 years instead of 12). According to ISTAT, of all the Italian geology graduates of 1992, only 38.8% were doing some work somehow related to their degree in 1995; 29.7% were still looking for any kind of job, while the remaining 32% were doing some kind of part-time or non-qualified work. The Natural Sciences degree was not faring better, also: of all the Italian naturalists graduated in 1992, 37.4% were still looking for a job in '95. As for Biology, with 50.3% of the '92 graduates still out of work in 1995, it was the absolute worst case (the general average of unenployed graduates is 23%). So, generally speaking, the outlook here is, as I said, bleak. Also, in 1992, the structure of the Geology Courses was modified, bringing the number of exams up to 27 from the original 17 and adding 1 year to the expected 4 years of study. Such changes seem to have increased the overall difficulty of getting to the end of it all. Again, according to ISTAT data, currently only one student out of three goes on to complete his course of studies. At the moment, here in Turin University, where I'm currently working on my extremely belated Micropalaeontology degree, the general attitude of the teachers is to advise the students to leave the university and go find a "proper" job, instead of "wasting time" with geology, and many are following such advice. I wonder if this is enough of a horror story for Dr. Hale. And this is all. Cheers. Davide Mana Torino, Italy
Partial index: