[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
This message is posted for Nicole Smith ---------- I do not feel that paleontologists lack credibility, but rather visibility(save for a few...Baker, Gould, etc...)---and this may be why so few paleontologists have been contacted concerning this Mars issue, (ridiculous though all this may seem.) Dinosaur studies are more of a media darling than invertebrate paleontology (for instance)--and the media will go with what they are familiar with more quickly than bothering to research an issue fully.(Much easier to get to press that way--grossly inaccurate--but easier.) >From what I glean from the public in general, paleontology is often grouped under the general category of geology----so much so that little to no distinction is ever made between the general and the speciality. When speaking of matters paleontological--people want to talk to a "geologist". Any geologist will do--and so the local paper goes hammering on their local geologist's door--ignoring the fact that she is really a geochemist (insert any other speciality of geology here.) That's my two-cents worth. Nicole Smith Geology/anthropology Auburn Univeristy
Partial index: