[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
In a message dated 96-08-24 16:25:18 EDT, you write: > 7. On the other hand, this has the potential to do wonders for > paleontology. Like dinosaurs, everyone is interested in extraterrestrial > life. So, even if it gets disproved or is questionable, I think we should > make our own hoopla over exopaleontology, if not for additional funding, > then as a tool to improve scientific reasoning and discipline visibility. > Speeking of hooplah... Just think of it. If this micro-Martian turns out to be verifiable (and I still have some doubts) then the questions become Did evolution of lfe on Mars parallel in mode if not tempo the evolution of terrestrial life? Was Martian paleo-molecular biology similar to what we believe was the case for early earth? Did Mars' lower gravity have any effects? And the big question to me, would be, does this constitute the first known extraterrestrial mass extinction? Granted this is swerving into the realm of wild speculation but if we are to accept this announcement as is then we must consider the above questions with a straight face! I believe that we should take full advantage of this and any future opportunity as they arise. As public interest is piqued so does the desire hear from "the experts". The limelight focuses on us and presents an opportunity to educate the public, our politicians and the media all of whom we depend on for support in one form or another. Maybe we can take a lesson from political strategists and form our own truth squads to be ready with accurate and timely statements for the press as well as WEB addresses which are probably the best and most far reaching medium other than the mass media and which would be free from big medias' penchant for "literary liscense", hyperbole, and just plain inaccuracies. Food for thought. Regards, Thomas R. Lipka Paleontological/Geological Studies
Partial index: