[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Una may be right, but I'd be careful. I am sure that Elsevier would give you permission, and so why not ask. Would save a lot of trouble in the long run. >Mark Purnell <map2@leicester.ac.uk> writes: > >>I have recently been corresponding with Elsevier about ... >>incorporating information from [my own] published paper into >>a web document in much the same way that information would >>be incorperated into a review paper. ... > >Mark, > >Whether the source paper belongs to you or not, the doctrine >of fair use allows you to extract information (which cannot be >copyrighed) for criticism, commentary, and review. Hence, it >would not violate copyright. And if you ask your publisher as >a matter of courtesy for permission to do so, and they try to >intimidate you, then consider dealing with another publisher. > >It may be worthwhile to consult with a lawyer who specializes >in intellectual property and copyright law. Also, you can get >some free (!) pointers to relevant legal opinion in Usenet via >misc.legal.moderated. > > >> it seems that the big boys with a clear vested interest in >> printed paper are already one step ahead! > >Publishers have no vested interest in paper. It is expensive. >Their vested interest is in controlling the flow of income, by >controlling the medium of publication. At biology conferences >in the US over the past year, every major commercial publisher >seems to be showing off electronic versions of their journals. >Many professional societies are moving in this direction also. > > Una Smith una.smith@yale.edu > >Department of Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520-8104
Partial index: