[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
The point seems well taken that constant nitpicking at the scientific content of an otherwise entertaining, inspiring and educational movie is a counterproductive exercise. But I'm going to do it anyway: The amber from which the dino DNA was extracted in the movie came from the Dominican Republic. But Dominican Republic amber is all Late Eocene at the very earliest; no dinos* are going to be cloned from that source. Even pettier nitpicking: In a real Dominican Republic amber mine, you can't stand upright; the shafts are so narrow the miners have to crawl. In fact, there's very little Jurassic amber at all -- an unconfirmed report of Jurassic amber from Bornholm, Denmark is the only find I'm aware of. Several Cretaceous localities have amber with insects (Lebanon, northwest France, Taimyr Peninsula in Siberia, Manitoba, New Jersey, etc.), so that explains the T. rex and Triceratops, but I wonder where the DNA to clone the Brachiosaurus came from. Ben Waggoner Dept. of Integrative Biology University of California Berkeley, CA 94720 USA bmw@uclink2.berkeley.edu *except for the birds, of course -- that's the cladist in me talking
Partial index: