[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 1995 16:05:47 -0800 X-Sender: wriedel@popmail.ucsd.edu Mime-Version: 1.0 To: paleonet-owner@nhm.ac.uk From: William Riedel 619-534-4386 <wriedel@ucsd.edu> Subject: Marry, or partially mirror, MicroPal and Paleonet? Status: O Or, more precisely, might it not be desirable to duplicate intensely graphic and/or interactive paleontologic elements at the Berkeley and London sites (exhibits, paleonet forum, image collections, etc.)? For us in the US, it can take a frustratingly long time to display large images and to make hypertext jumps in interactive programs that reside on servers in Europe, and European geologists have told me that the same is true in the reverse direction. These delays may well be sufficient to discourage some people from viewing complicated interactive programs for which a trans-Atlantic server has to be accessed frequently. Would it be possible to duplicate the interactive programs at ucmp1 at nhm, and vice versa? I ask this in complete ignorance of the logical and political implications, but as one who suspects that there is substantial overlap between the subscribers to micropal and to paleonet. Bill R. W. Riedel Scripps Institution of Oceanography UCSD La Jolla, CA 92093-0220 wriedel@ucsd.edu phone (619) 534-4386 fax (619) 534-0784
Partial index: