[Thread Prev] [Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Date Index]

Industry Biostratigraphic Coordinators-1995 Objectives



Item Subject: Text_1
     For those of you who are not familiar with the Industry 
     Biostratigraphic Coordinators (formerly Industry Paleontology 
     Managers), we are a representative body of Paleontologists working 
     within the major oil companies.  We meet every 1-2 months and discuss 
     issues and problems facing paleontologists in industry as well as 
     those facing paleontology as a science.  It is not a formal 
     organization, nor are we affiliated with any society or external 
     organizations and we plan to maintain it as such.  We have a mission 
     and vision, but I will not share those here.  They are available for 
     those who are interested.  We do keep minutes and we thought there 
     might be a number of you out there who would be interested in our 
     results.  I will be sending out these minutes of our meetings as we 
     hold them for reasons of promoting communication with the entire 
     paleontological community.  I hope they will not be regarded as junk 
     E-mail and we would suggest that other such organizational interest 
     groups (museums, consultants, academics, funding organizations, etc), 
     where and if they have formed, might consider doing the same. As with 
     1994, we have set out a list of objectives that we would like to work 
     toward for 1995.  Those are listed below.  We had objectives for 1994 
     and earlier this year, we summarized our success/failure in meeting 
     those objectives. I will send that out at a later date.   
     
     
     
                 Industry Biostratigraphic Coordinators Group
       
                          Objectives for 1995 
     
     1.  Form a Paleontological Network including industry, consultants, 
     academia, government, museums, societies, etc.  
     
         <Ongoing. This we consider to be one of our big successes for 
     1994.  We organized the Denver AAPG Meetin consisting of a 
     cross-section of Paleontologists to begin a dialogue.  The main fall 
     out of this meeting was the establishing of PaleoNet. Thanks to the 
     major effort of the NHM, London it is a reality.  We also have 
     organized a Paleo Network Meeting in Seattle and Houston.  Bottom line 
     on the objective is that we strongly feel that paleontologists of all 
     disciplines and organizations need to communicate better so as to form 
     a more cohesive science. Remember what Ben Franklin said about 
     `hanging together or surely we will all hang apart'.  I hate to remind 
     us of that PaleoNet dialogue/junk e-mail.>   
     
     2.  Send out summaries of annual results and meeting summaries on 
     PaleoNet, Micropal
     
     <Just what we are trying to do.>
     
     3.  Meet with Museum Specialists to begin Networking.
     
     <With industry focusing on the applications only part of the work 
     chain, we feel the heart of paleontology is left hanging.  The 
     analysis and taxonomic part of our business is at risk and we want to 
     do something about it.  Museums would seem to us to be a stable 
     organizational entity that with the available staffing could carry 
     this part of paleontology forward and perhaps make a profit at it.  It 
     certainly is more vision than reality at this time, but we would like 
     to talk to a group of museum paleontologists/directors to see what 
     could if anything be structured.>
     
     4.  Identify key contacts in museums, NSF, Government, Academia, 
     Surveys, etc., for communication--resource reasons.
     
     <We believe that, in addition to paleontologists communicating through 
     PaleoNet, journals and so on, we need the leaders of museums, heads of 
     government paleo groups, heads of industry paleo groups, key 
     academicians, etc.,  to be communicating.  We sense that this is not 
     happening.  Such a communicating group could be a powerful force 
     within the scientific world and could do nothing but good for 
     paleontology as a whole.>
     
     5.  Continue to investigate quality best practices among vendors and 
     options.
          --processing/sample handling
          --analysis
     
     <We feel we need to provide consultants and vendors with some best 
     practices guidelines to improve and standardize quality of processing 
     and analysis of fossils that we ask them to work on for us.>  
      
     6.  Formalize a plan for an industry library network.
             a.  Initial focus on current journal subscriptions.
             b.  Contact person at each company for books.
             c.  Highlight strengths of each.
     
     <Large industry paleontological libraries are currently at risk and we 
     need to strategize around maintaining them and utilizing them most 
     effectively to all of our benefit.>
     
     7.  Work on article targeted for Explorer on need for paleo 
     coordinators in larger independents.  Initiate with follow-up letter 
     informing them of available biostrat. services to differentiate 
     between independents doing paleo/rock work vs. no paleo.
     
     <Many larger independent oil companies request volumes of 
     paleontological work from outside sources but they do not have the 
     staff to analyze and effectively utilize the paleo information they 
     receive.  We would like to convince them that they can save and make 
     money by having at least one paleontolgist on staff.  This would also 
     probably have the effect of increasing the work for those on the 
     outside.>
     
     8.  Establish User Groups on Quantitative Stratigraphy and Ragware.
     
     <We would like to start some Houston based discussion groups on 
     particular computer product use or emerging specialties.>
     
     9.  Promote better communications with Houston area paleo community.
     
     10.  Compile a contractor register for vendor services.
     
     
     <We would appreciate any comments that you may have.  Are we on 
     target, or do you think there are other matters we should be 
     addressing.>