[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
On Fri, 5 May 1995, Barry Roth wrote: > > Finally, I think my criticism is fundamental because it goes to the question > of what the Benton study purports to measure and whether the units of > measurement ("families") are good estimators of those phenomena. (Also, I'd > like to have a good answer for my son when he asks, in his innocent way, > "Daddy, how many species are there in a family?" and "Is that the same for > horses as for graptolites?") > > My guess is that your son will be more interested in how families of horses or graptolites lived rather than how many species were in the family. If the study of life on earth was just a matter of figuring out how many species were present now or in the past I would get out of the business. Evolution is about morphologic change and adaptation to the environment. The sorting of species into families based on their morphology is a very useful tool. There is no need to have a constant number of species in a family. Peter Sheehan
Partial index: