[Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
You could easily put what I know about Devonian fishes in a fortune cookie, but I'll comment anyway. Ahlberg mentions seven genera. However, I see that Carroll lists three "amphibians"; seven "palaeoniscoids"; 40 "rhipidistians"; four onychodontids; four actinistians; and 20 lungfish for the entire Devonian. That's the good news. But with only 78 genera for an interval of about 50 million years, it would seem difficult to establish significant differences in standing diversity or turnover rates among sub-intervals such as stages - even assuming that the lengths of those stages and the correlations of faunas to those stages were well-establish. Based on the Foote paper in the latest Paleobiology, standardizing turnover rates for time when working with data like these would seem a nightmarish task. Also remember that one should at least compute binomial confidence intervals on diversity/turnover data when dealing with small sample sizes (e.g., as in multiple Foote papers), and one might end up with nothing to talk about after doing so.
Partial index: