Returned mail: User unknown

From
Date
Reply-To
I am sorry to continue to clutter up PaleoNet, but it looks like Shell Oil
Co. is now saving money by returning email directed to their employees.
Another example of meanness in corporations??   Or just another corporate
screw-up, like so many others that cost them and us lots of money.  [Oh,
did ya hear the news this morning about the average salary for CEOs in
America.  For Wall Streeters its just over $1-mill/yr, and it goes down
from there just a bit in other industries.  I wonder what the top guys
make, and the poor suckers at the bottom that drag the average down.
Sorry, I missed the oil industry part, but they must be making a bundle for
all those wise decisions they've made lately.  Anyone know if the oil CEOs
have been downsized yet?  Can't just be paleontologists!]

If you are still out there Mike Styzen, you might tell your postmaster that
you are still at Shell, unless he/she/it knows something you don't!   Maybe
you should stop sending those messages--could be the postmaster reads
PaleoNet.

Here's what I tried to get past your system to you:

Jere

>Date: Wed, 28 Dec 94 18:06:08 -0600
>From: Mail Delivery Subsystem <MAILER-DAEMON@shell.com>
>Subject: Returned mail: User unknown
>To: postmaster@shell.com
>To: jlipps@ucmp1.Berkeley.EDU
>
>   ----- Transcript of session follows -----
>550 mstyzen... User unknown
>
>   ----- Unsent message follows -----
>Received: by shellgate.shell.com SHELLGATE-I1.3 id AA07039; Wed, 28 Dec 94
>18:06:08 -0600
>Received: from ucmp1.Berkeley.EDU by uu5.psi.com (5.65b/4.0.071791-PSI/PSINet)
>via SMTP;
>        id AA20388 for mstyzen; Wed, 28 Dec 94 18:43:31 -0500
>Received: from [128.32.146.82] (ucmp3.Berkeley.EDU) by ucmp1.Berkeley.EDU
>(4.1/1.31)
>        id AA15997; Wed, 28 Dec 94 15:50:32 PST
>Date: Wed, 28 Dec 94 15:50:32 PST
>Message-Id: <9412282350.AA15997@ucmp1.Berkeley.EDU>
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>To: mstyzen@shell.com
>From: jlipps@ucmp1.Berkeley.EDU (Jere H. Lipps)
>Subject: Re: Log analysts vs Paleontologists
>Cc: nm@mailserver.nhm.ac.uk
>
>Mike:
>
>Thanks for posting your note to MicroPal.  It's pertinent to most
>micropaleo types.
>
>I didn't mean to clutter up PaleoNet with my request to you, but the
>program PaleoNet uses seems to send the replies back to the bulletin board
>rather than the originator.  MicroPal sends the replies back to the
>originator.  We use listproc software, and I forgot what PaleoNet uses.
>Anyway its confusing.  Sorry.
>
>Jere
>
>
>