| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
> >Philip Johnson was largely inspired to attack > >evolution because of reading Dawkins. > > > Or was it that he read Dawkins so he could attack evolution? I have > trouble believing he picked up "The Selfish Gene" or "The Blind > Watchmaker" with an open mind and without a priori assumptions. Certainly some a priori assumptions were at work, e.g. an apparent predisposition for conspiracy theories, otherwise Johnson might have accepted the sound science in Dawkins and rejected the philosophical/religious errors. Both of them claim evolution implies atheism when in fact evolution only tells us about how organisms work. -- Dr. David Campbell 425 Scientific Collections Building Department of Biological Sciences Biodiversity and Systematics University of Alabama, Box 870345 Tuscaloosa AL 35487-0345 USA
Partial index: