| [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Thread Index] | [Date Prev] | [Date Next] | [Date Index] |
Concerning the cheer-leading that goes on for society journals and
online publishing ...
I don't know the details of the economics of the magazines that
are the "learned journals", but my friends in the more conventional
publishing industry tell me that the "cover price" of the magazine
makes up something like 1/3 of the actual cost of production and
publishing. The rest of the costs of publication and the profit margin
come from the sale of advertising space. In the commercial journals
this comes from two main sources - the sale of equipment and software
relevant to the discipline(s) covered by the magazine, and secondly
from the recruitment adverts.
If you want to make an impact on the policies and prices of the
commercial journals, then you will have a much faster and greater
effect if you can address this issue. If you can take some of that
advertising revenue, then you will hit them in the only organ they care
about (the wallet); if you can reduce the effectiveness of that
advertising (e.g. by purchasing from people who don't advertise in the
commercial journals AND telling the companies involved why you excluded
them from the tendering process), you'll hit them in the wallet and
you'll get their attention. Unfortunately, in both cases you're more
likely to actually push the commercial journals into *raising* their
cover price than reducing it.
The area where a "grass roots" campaign is most likely to be
rapidly effective is by repositioning recruitment advertising. In this
respect I already see an appreciable amount of job advertising going
past on the mailing list (ATTN: list manager : does a "Palaeonet-jobs"
list sound credible?) ; moving some of that advertising onto the
websites of (for example) Palaeo.Electronica should be comparatively
easy (does P.E. have the database back-end to handle this sort of
static, rapidly changing content, and to do the relevant billing ; is
there a financial billing model?).
How much of the recruitment advertising in e.g. Nature comes
directly from the departments recruiting, and how much from
institution-level Human Remains Mangling Offices (sorry, private joke,
a friend is a Hunam Resources Manageress) who see the large commercial
journals as a good institutional hedge against allegations of cronyism,
discrimination etc. Is there a line here where the on-line journals
could benefit from some targeted advertising? (An article in an on-line
HRM journal would be particularly apposite.)
--
Aidan Karley,
Aberdeen, Scotland,
Location: 57°10' N, 02°09' W (sub-tropical Aberdeen), 0.021233
Written at Mon, 18 Apr 2005 08:28 +0100
Partial index: