paleonet In his own words....

["Dr. Lisa E. Park" <lepark@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I found this quote by Duane Gish the other day.  I thought it was rather
interesting........does this mean that most Creationists know that it isn't
science and try to pass it off as such anyway? If this is true, then that
would be extremely disingenuous.


"Creation is, of course, unproven and unprovable and thus cannot be
considered as fact. It is not subject to test by the ordinary methods of
experimental science-observation and falsification. It thus does not, in a
strict sense, even qualify as a scientific theory"

From:
"Evolution: The Challenge of the Fossil Record"
1986. Creation-Life Publishers. (Page 19)

By Duane T. Gish, Ph.D
Vice President, Institute for Creation Research (sic)


Lisa